<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Schulman+Thorogood&#187; B2B Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/tag/b2b-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog</link>
	<description>Schulman+Thorogood Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Which came first: Sales 2.0 or Customer 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/2010/04/15/which-came-first-sales-2-0-or-customer-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/2010/04/15/which-came-first-sales-2-0-or-customer-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pelin Wood Thorogood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[demand generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B2B Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like one of those chicken or the egg questions…and given all the buzz about Sales 2.0 technologies and methodologies, you might be tempted to answer “Sales 2.0”.  But I think Sales 2.0 is really the sales organizations response to the “evolve or die” mandate they face, given the smarter and more informed buyer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_blue" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fschulmanthorogood.com%252Fblog%252F2010%252F04%252F15%252Fwhich-came-first-sales-2-0-or-customer-2-0%252F%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FcrHwoE%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22big%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Which%20came%20first%3A%20Sales%202.0%20or%20Customer%202.0%3F%22%20%7D);"></div>
<p>It sounds like one of those chicken or the egg questions…and given all the buzz about <a href="http://www.sales20conf.com/SF2010/">Sales 2.0</a> technologies and methodologies, you might be tempted to answer “Sales 2.0”.  But I think Sales 2.0 is really the sales organizations response to the “evolve or die” mandate they face, given the smarter and more informed buyer they have to sell to: <a href="http://www.insideview.com/customer-20.html" target="_blank">Customer 2.0</a>.   I do believe the customer has evolved faster than the sales guy…and I believe this is – at least in part – due to how B2B trends typically follow B2C.  Prospects who are looking to make B2B purchase decisions are also consumers, and have been making B2C decisions for a long time.  Access to online reviews, comparison shopping engines, Facebook or Twitter “conversations” on products and services they are evaluating has turned them into much wiser B2C buyers…So, why not transfer that same process, powered by “social intelligence”, to the B2B buying cycle? <span id="more-34"></span></p>
<p>I started an <a href="http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/2010/03/08/bridging-the-sales-and-marketing-chasm-with-smarketing/">earlier blog post </a>with the observation “We market and sell in a brave new world where prospects are equipped with near x-ray vision into companies, products and people they are considering doing business with.”  This statement implies Customer 2.0 holds all the cards!  Hence, evening out the playing field requires sales to be <em>just as knowledgeable </em>about the buyer and <a href="http://www.insidecrm.com/features/sales2-improve-business-112508/" target="_blank">bring real value to the sales process </a>by demonstrating why their products and services can solve the customer’s unique business challenges.  Relevance emerges as the key to <a href="http://www.sandhill.com/opinion/editorial.php?id=297" target="_blank">synchronizing the selling cycle with the buying cycle</a>.  Armed with a 360° view of their prospect’s business that can only come from “listening to” them and engaging them through social media, sales people now have the opportunity to gain the deep insights necessary to get Customer 2.0’s attention &#8211; insights that will drive Customer 2.0 into deeper engagement with your company and delivering on the ultimate promise of Sales 2.0!</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schulmanthorogood.com/blog/2010/04/15/which-came-first-sales-2-0-or-customer-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

