Call it the ‘Death of Marketing Tour,” a bit of a morbid title, but the theme is rapidly gaining traction. That’s because it’s not actually about the “death” of marketing, but about its total re-birth in the social era.

Pelin and I made two local speaking stops in the last two weeks to deliver STG’s though-provoking new presentation: “The Death of Marketing as We Know It: Adapting Marketing to Changing Customer Behaviors and Demands.” The presentation describes the sea change in marketing, from outbound to inbound programs; the rise of the “content engineer” to effectively engage the changing customer; and the importance of establishing a culture of measurement to optimize the marketing mix. The genesis for the presentation came from an essay STG wrote for Cornell Enterprise called “The Birth of Customer 2.0 & The Death of Marketing As We Know It.”

Our first stop last month: the San Diego Software Industries Council (SDSIC) on April 22. The feedback was great. Wrote one marketing executive: “This was the best presentation that I’ve attended through SDSIC to date (and I’ve attended quite a few). Congratulations on a successful event today!”

Our second stop: San Diego State University (SDSU), where we spoke to Karen Marchetti‘s Internet marketing class. The response was great there too, with many students engaging with us on emerging marketing careers in new media.

Earlier this spring, Pelin gave a similar presentation to the Cornell University Entrepreneurship and Innovative Institute. Last month, Pelin and Rand gave a university wide presentation at the University of the Pacific (UoP), which may be considering a future curriculum in  content engineering.

As the web becomes cluttered with more data and spam generated by black hat games and content farms, relevant Content becomes more critical. The key is findability. Can your content be found? There are many ways to insure good results but there’s a lack of formal education around the new media and just how to do that. Though Web Analytics has been around for a decade, few really use it to optimize their work and we know why and it needs to be addressed by higer education and creating relevant graduates. But things are changing so quickly, so how do you that in this environment and what is the role of higher education in setting the foundation, and giving tools to future content creators?

I’ve been talking about a new disciple that I’ve called Content Engineering for about five years, and now I’m happy to say that higher education is addressing the issue head-on. Pelin and I are speaking to the students and facility, hosted by the Deans of the Business, Engineering and Liberal Arts schools at the University of the Pacific to share our vision of how Social Media is changing marketing and those of us who create content. What’s key is that UOP recognizes that students and future Content Engineers will need critical skills across disciplines – English & Communications; Business and Engineering. We expect to see more schools and universities create programs that address these requirements in the near future.

This is a good start.

I am here at beautiful but frigid Cornell, at the invitation of Steven Gal of the Johnson Graduate School of Business, to guest lecture at his entrepreneurial marketing class.  The reason for the invite:  MBA students are starved for practical knowledge on how to leverage social media and online marketing for their entrepreneurial efforts.   When Dr. Gal announced my impending visit to his colleagues, other entrepreneurship professors jumped at the opportunity to engage me as well.  My jam-packed schedule for the three days on campus include several classroom lectures, a lecture at the Cornell Entrepreneurship and Innovation Institute, meeting with the aspiring entrepreneurs of Cornell eLab, dinners with the entrepreneurship professors and few of their hand-picked students, as well as meeting with the Cornell Enterprise team.  Add to this the numerous ad-hoc meetings with individual student-entrepreneurs who want to pick my brain on their go-to-market models. You get the picture…Whew!

But there is good reason for this insane demand…and Dr. David BenDaniel said it best during dinner last night: Universities are falling behind in incorporating the latest social media and online marketing developments – and their massive implications to business strategy – into their curriculums.  (Incidentally Dr. BenDaniel was my entrepreneurship professor during my Johnson years…and helped me get connected with UCSD Connect which lead to my very first start-up experience – the man is an icon! ).   Cornell is actually doing much better than most in this area since it has such a well-organized curriculum around entrepreneurship at Johnson as well as a massive University-wide initiative.   But traditional marketing courses in most business schools still focus too much on “old-style” marketing strategies and are creating future Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG)-marketing leaders.   This needs to change.   Clearly not all MBA students are entrepreneurial, and many will take on more traditional marketing roles within CPG companies such as Johnson & Johnson, Unilever or P&G.  But the reality is that the use of social media and online marketing is no longer limited to start-ups or tech companies in Silicon Valley.  One of the social media success examples I gave during my lectures is about Whole Foods.  Whole Foods has impressively embraced social media more than most, gathering over nearly 2 million followers on Twitter and half million fans on Facebook in the process. While it is easy to understand why a relatively young company or one started by a tech-savvy founder would so completely embrace social media communication tools, it is quite a bit more remarkable for an almost 30 year old established brick and mortar company with roughly 50,000 employees and over 270 stores worldwide to have done so.  And they are not alone.  More and more companies are following this model and embracing inbound marketing strategies to engage the new customer (Customer 2.0) in the emerging media channels.

Seems to me we have a great opportunity to add our new truths to the well-established curriculum.   If we don’t teach tomorrow’s business leaders about the opportunities and challenges presented by social media and online marketing, how can we expect them to lead their employees who are likely to be more social-media savvy then their managers? How can we expect them to steer their companies successfully without at least understanding the new go-to-market models powered by the social Web?  While there is undoubtedly a lot of hands-on learning the students will do when they step out into the “real world”, business schools must do their part in educating our future business leaders to not just survive but thrive in this brave new world.  My trip here indicates that the Johnson entrepreneurship professors certainly get this…and the conversation with Dr.  Vithala Rao this afternoon – who asked me to come back in the fall for more! - tells me Johnson marketing is on board as well…

I am delighted that my Alma Mater is once again taking the lead.  I’d say definitely worth the 18 hour round-trip 

It’s sure great to talk to real people for perspective. We don’t do it nearly enough. Those of us in Silicon Valley spend too much time talking to each other and obsess endlessly about the buzz du jour – Twitter’s analytics;  Facebook’s privacy; the newest browser; Google’s new search algorithm and the games SEOs play. We talk about Social CRM, Social Selling, Customer 2.0. viral, Freemium, brand  and conversions.  But it’s not the real world.

My partner Pelin and I were invited to present a keynote recently for a Strategic Marketing Conference hosted by Cornell University at the beautiful and historic FDR Presidential Library, a few hours from NYC, in the Hudson Valley where the autumn colors where in their full glory. We presented our topic, and a recurring them about how marketing is dramatically changing to attendees from around the country – professors; business leaders, students and entrepreneurs.

We were honored to present our observations about the rise of Inbound Marketing, and some of our experience working with “cutting edge firms”, like Eightfold Logic, ViralHeat, and InsideView each pioneering these new concepts. We regularly speak at technical conferences, but we thought this might be a bit different as it had a general and mostly non technical audience. A few minutes into our presentation we asked a series of questions to find out more about the attendees, “How many of you use web analytics” – most hands went up.  That’s good we thought. “How many of you use links on your web site, and know how to link”?  This time almost no hands were raised and few knew how to link, and NO ONE knew the value search engines place on the right links!

How could that be? Surely they MUST understand the value of linking? Well, no, they didn’t. I’ve been creating marketing applications for 15 years and have to constantly  be reminded about the adoption myth. The one where I think everyone uses our products, and they don’t. While the rate of adoption will certainly be more rapid than it’s been in the past, the rest of the world is not living in our tech bubble. The real world is doing just fine and it’s good for me to get out and be reminded not drink too much of my own bath water. While a link is ubiquitous, its value is not understood by most. And that’s the lesson I relearned during my visit to Cornell. In future posts I’ll talk about how we can accelerate adoption. What role colleges and universities need to play, and what marketing skills will look like in the not too distant future.

Rand and I just gave a very well-attended webinar to the Cornell Entrepreneur Network titled, “The Birth of Customer 2.0 and the Death of Marketing as we know it”. One of the primary trends we discussed is the emergence of Inbound Marketing – and given the tremendous interest, I wanted to talk a bit more about it here on our blog.

It is clear to all of us that online marketing and social media have dramatically changed the marketing practice over the past decade. They have certainly made it a lot more measurable and accountable – much more of a science. They have also made it a lot more interactive and collaborative with the target customer.

Yet it is important to note that some of the marketing fundamentals haven’t changed. Marketing has always been and continues to be about knowing our audience so we can target them with relevant messages that will resonate. Of course the best way to resonate with our audience – really in any situation – is by listening to them before talking. So the fundamental approach to marketing hasn’t changed but how we do it, the tools we employ and how we define and measure success certainly has…

Traditional – or as it is coming to be known as “Outbound Marketing” – focuses on finding customers by building brand awareness and demand through PR, online and offline advertising as well as direct mail and email promotions. It is the company reaching out to the customer – presumably with a compelling message or offer – to entice them to buy their products and services.

Inbound Marketing is a new approach to marketing that optimizes getting found by customers. It is about attracting customers to the business…Whether through search engine optimization (SEO), paid search, social media, or relevant cross-linking, Inbound Marketing is focused on helping businesses improve website “findability” for qualified buyers. The bonus is Inbound Marketing also benefits the visitor with improved content relevancy and linked resources.

What’s important to note about outbound marketing is that it is “interrupt-driven”. What I mean by that is, just like that a TV or pop-up web ad, we interrupt whatever the customer (both B2B and B2C) may be doing with a “message from the sponsor”. Even email is interrupt driven.

So to put it simply, with Inbound Marketing, marketers “earn their way in” vs. “buy, beg or bug their way in”!
One of the biggest problems with outbound marketing – besides the interruption factor – is that it has to rise above the noise to be effective…and the amount of noise is growing exponentially. There are too many ads, too many email offers, too many websites, simply too much content out there – and of course that’s further complicated by less and less time and attention on the part of the buyer.

In an earlier post, I described Customer 2.0 as NOT wanting to be “sold to”…as being informed about products and services not from the vendor’s messaging but from peer to peer conversations. Hence interrupt driven marketing is NOT effective with Customer 2.0. They want to find the right products and services themselves. But given the increasing noise level I just described, rising above it and being “findable” isn’t easy.

The KEY to findability is relevance. It is back to those marketing fundamentals I described earlier, since relevance comes from a deeper understanding of customer behavior and sentiment…it comes from listening before shouting out our outbound marketing messages.

Perhaps not too surprisingly, Inbound Marketing comes with another bonus: unlike its program $$ heavy counterpart, it is people (that is time and effort) heavy. It is about generating the right content in the right places, building and fostering user communities for productive engagement to enable the right people – qualified prospects – to FIND us. Sounds interesting? Stay tuned for more discussion on innovative approaches and emerging best practices in a future post…